26 May 2021

VIAIR 88P 12v Portable Air Compressor Custom Travel Tote Designed by SATAS Co

 

Campout, April 2021 (Photo by V.A. McMillan)

The VIAIR 88P portable 12-volt air compressor is a handy piece of gear, especially if you drive routes that take you off paved roads. Of course, having a portable air compressor to top up tires even when traveling the blacktop is also quite convenient. 

This compressor unit was a gift and came from Amazon, checkout my review (https://www.amazon.ca/gp/customer-reviews/R1HPSAMZ2C94SM/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B005ASY23I). I am impressed with this little unit, considerably more useful than my last 12-volt air pump. 

There are two things I would change, if the design team at VIAIR were to give me a call. 1) This air compressor would be even better if it had a 1/4" quick connect. Then any 1/4" air hose with the proper 1/4" quick connect fitting would be usable, thus making replacement in the years to come much easier for the end user. 

2) The 88P deserves a beefier travel bag. The one that comes with it is well made, however it is too tight for frequent use. Because the bag is so tight, I fear the air hose has unnecessary pressure placed on it right where it connects to the compressor. This is a poor design in my opinion. 

To solve this issue SATAS Co. has designed a prototype travel tote for the VIAIR 88P 12-volt portable air compressor.

Original VIAIR Tote and the New SATAS Co Prototype

As you can see in the photo above, the original VIAIR tote is a compact package. It is around 10" long by 5" wide and almost 6 1/2" tall. In contrast, the SATAS Co prototype Travel Tote is 13" long by 6" wide and over 7" tall. Further, the prototype uses felted fibre padding to protect the air compressor from minor bumps while in transit on gravel roads.

Here is a closeup shot of the top of the compressor:


The air hose connects just below the air pressure gauge. You will notice the power cable has plenty of space at the bottom of the Travel Tote.


The Travel Tote allows the air hose to be loosely coiled inside placing minimal stress on the hose mounting point on the compressor.


The air hose is long enough to reach from the rad area of a 1998 Tahoe to either back tire. The power cable is heavy enough to survive filling a tire without overheating and the clamps are sturdy and grip the battery posts without having to worry if they will slip off before your inflation job is complete.



One last upgrade is the under lid storage pouch and pen/tire gauge pocket. The pen pocket was made from fuzzy (loop) Velcro type material, so you can stick extra stuff on, if needed. The pouch has a small Velcro type closure to keep accessories inside. 

If you need a Travel Tote for your VIAIR 88P portable compressor here are the basic plans that were used to create the prototype:




Maybe the folks at VIAIR will reach out and want to chat about making a custom Travel Tote for the VIAIR 88P 12-volt portable air compressor. 

Until next time...If you find an issue with your new gear, then find a solution!!

Mountainman.




08 May 2021

Canada First Model for National Defence: Naval Assets

 

L'Anse aux Meadows, Nfld (Photo by V.A. McMillan 17 Jul 2012)

A short while ago, I started this discussion with adjusting the Canadian Forces High Command from a Political Patronage Model to the Canada First Model. (You can find that post here: https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2021/04/future-cf-structure-from-partisan.html). Further, all new Canadian submarines should employ the tethered drone antenna system I suggested previously (https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2021/04/design-idea-tethered-drone-antenna-for.html).

Moving forward, with the Canada First Model for long-term strategic planning for the defence of Canada that is immune to petty political interference and intrigues. The first big leap has to be based on planning that looks at the service life of each piece of equipment necessary for the defence of Canada and then ensuring there will always be a ready supply to replace units that are reaching the end of their service life. This can also be a thread to explore later, of the process to have frontline equipment, second line equipment and third line equipment, before retiring said equipment from service.

The exploration of a Canada First Model for National Defence will begin with a look at our Naval assets. I will skip a review of our current assets, that information is available somewhere on the world wide web. I will focus on developing a list of naval assets that should be produced by Canadian manufacturers in direct support of the Canadian Forces.

If the current economic situation requires the government of the day to spend trillions of dollars of borrowed money, by God, there better be something to show for that debt at the end of this nightmare other than the total enslavement of the Canadian people. One possible solution is to borrow to invest in defending Canada and by extension re-building Canadian industry from coast-to-coast-to-coast!

Even one trillion dollars focused towards rebuilding the Canadian Navy would go an awfully long way to putting Canadians back to work, strengthening the defence of the Canadian coastline, which is the longest in the world – according to online sources; and revitalizing Canadian shipbuilding yards on the Pacific coast, Atlantic Coast and on the shores of the Great lakes. With this in mind, ships should be scaled to make the most of our local builders.

Unlike the political patronage model, where only one or two shipyards are building ships and the rest are starving for work and contracts, the whole point of a Canada First Model, would be to ensure the widest possible spread of sustainable manufacturing across the country. Those in other manufacturing industries fear not,  future blog posts will explore land-based equipment and armaments, as well as air assets. The Canada First Model will be a systems approach to ensure harmony of production towards a common goal - defence of Canada, through Canadian innovation, industry, and employment.

Let’s look at some details…


The proposed naval fleet composition will be based on a Helicopter Carrier and Hospital Ship group. For defence of Canada, aid to civil powers in the event of a major disaster, and/or aiding our NATO or NORAD allies this combination of naval and air assets would make Canada a better ally than current contribution which are strangled by political interference.

Looking at each fleet, starting with the Pacific Fleet:


Battle Group 1: will be Canada’s contribution to blue water patrolling of Canadian territorial waters and be the assets for foreign deployments around the Pacific to aid our allies.

Battle Group 2: will be primarily for the defence of Canada’s Pacific coastline; as well as, training Naval Primary Reserve Units.

Next, is the Atlantic Fleet:


Battle Group 1: will be Canada’s contribution to aiding our NATO partners and blue water patrolling of Canadian territorial waters.

Battle Group 2: will primarily focus on coastline patrol and training Naval Primary Reserve Units.

The Arctic Fleet:

The Arctic Fleet will have two missions. The primary mission is to conduct surveillance of the North-West Passage and sub-surface surveillance of Canadian territorial waters. The secondary mission is to ensure connectivity between Northern Communities in the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut.

Finally, the Great Lakes Fleet:


The Great Lakes Fleet would be broken down to Patrol Groups on Lakes Superior, Huron, Eire, and Ontario. This would increase Canadian presence on these bodies of water to ensure sovereignty and border integrity via water routes to land access points. Further, the addition of a Hospital Ship on Lake Ontario would be a giant step forward for emergency preparedness in the event of a disaster in the Greater Toronto Area.

Parting shot…in closing this post, I would like to briefly touch on adding a few strategic naval bases to support this expanded Canadian Navy.


The Pacific Coast would maintain its current bases at Esquimalt and Nanoose Bay. A new facility would be needed at Port Rupert or somewhere nearby. Further, a series of coastal outposts would be a smart move to allow the Coastal Patrol vessels and River Patrol boats a place to make contact with locals, re-supply/refuel, and gather intel.

The Atlantic Fleet would improve current facilities at Halifax and St. John’s. Like in the Pacific, a series of coastal outposts would be the right approach to networking with the locals and improving communication exchanges. A submarine harbour near Goose Bay would be something to consider.

The Arctic Fleet would need new facilities at Tuktoyaktuk, Iqaluit, near Sanikiluaq, and near Akimiski Island. Further, protecting in the inner North-West Passage by establishing surveillance beds for Stalker Class submarines would be a good idea. Finally, having the Polar 8 Ice Breakers in the region would aid rescue missions for ships or aircraft stranded in or on the ice.

This has become a bit long for a blog post, so I will end it there for today.

So, until next time…write your plans down and share them!

Mountainman.


04 May 2021

Improving the Amazon Basic Vehicle Tablet Mount - Fit Tablet in a Protective Case

 

Mount Livingstone, Alberta (Photo by V.A. McMillan, 2020)

Do you need to mount a tablet that is in a protective case into your vehicle?? Are you planning to use the Amazon Basic Vehicle Tablet Mount?? Are you concerned reviews state the mount will not work with tablets in a protective case?? Looking for a solution??

This blog post is to solve the issues described above. Use the Amazon Basic Vehicle Tablet Mount (https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B07RD8B8ZB/) and modify it to work with a tablet in a protective case. 

Caveat - the solution I will propose will work best if you are looking for using your tablet when the vehicle is stationary. I did not create this solution to solve using a tablet in a protective case while the vehicle is in motion, this will likely work; however, you will have to use your own deductive investigating skills to prove that this solution works for that need as well.

Let's start by looking at the Amazon Basic Vehicle Tablet Mount:


First, the quality of this mount is quite good and uses a blend of metal and plastic materials. Further, there are plenty of adjustments for both anchoring to a post and adjusting screen viewing angle of the tablet when mounted.

The challenge with this tablet mount is the spacing between the nubs and the frame is too narrow to hold a tablet in a protective case. See below.

The mounting nub before modification

The mounting nub after modification

The following tools and supplies will be required to perform the modification:
1x Hand Saw

1x Flat File

1x Robertson Screwdriver

1x 10 mm wrench or socket & ratchet

4x 1 1/4" x #10-24 Machine Screws

4x #10 Flat Washers

4x #10-24 Nyloc Nuts

8x 1/4 S Flat Faucet Washers - Rubber

Step One:

Cut off the four (4) plastic mounting nubs.


Step Two:

Re-assemble. File plastic nub cut area flat, if needed. Using the #10-24 x 1 1/4" machine screw, thread from nub towards frame, add 2x 1/4 S rubber washers, push assembly through frame. Add #10 flat washer (outside of frame), and secure together with the #10-24 Nyloc nut.


Step Three:

Using a #2 Robertson screwdriver and a 10mm wrench, snug the whole assembly together until the threads from the machine screw just pass the nylon of the nut. See below.


Step Four:

Install the modified bracket into your vehicle, anchoring to one of the headrest posts. Once you are happy with the anchor location, tighten the large thumbscrew. See below.


Step Five:

Finally, install your tablet into your new vehicle tablet mount. As I stated earlier, I do not need my tablet to be mounted while the vehicle is in motion, thus, I am using the mount top and bottom, not corner to corner. See below.


This entire project took less than two-hours including going shopping at the local hardware store for the machine screws and other parts. The actual modifying took less than an hour, while carefully using a handsaw to make those vital cuts to remove the plastic nubs. I do not have a fancy shop, so this had to be completed on my front deck, without power tools. 

For those who may attempt this modification, knowing exactly what hardware is required and how many should speed up and economize your project. 

Total cost: $29.95

Amazon Bracket: $17.20

Hardware: $12.75 (2.99+2.99+2.79+1.99+1.99) 

I am sure if your hardware store sells #10 machine screws and parts individually, your costs will be lower. Many of these packages had more screws, washers, and nuts than were needed for the project.

Until next time...If you see what you need, but it needs modifying to work, then modify it!

Mountainman.
 

 

 

 


29 April 2021

Future CF Structure: From A Partisan Political Model to a Canada First Model (Concept Idea)

 

Crowsnest Mountain, Alberta (by V.A. McMillan)

Today, let's talk about restructuring the Canadian Forces (CF) in a manner that respects the men and women in uniform who serve to protect our nation from all threats foreign and domestic. 

Currently, and since the creation of Canada in 1867, we have had a national defence system that is explicitly connected to the government of the day. This partisan political system has been exploited and corrupted at every opportune moment by every political party that has ever been in power. Yes, some forward thinking political representatives have worked very hard to help the CF, but that has been the minority.

To move forward, I am suggesting a national defence system based on the strategic and operational NEEDS of defending Canada and Canadians as the first priority. A system which hopes to separate political maneuvering and vote buying from the actual job of defending the country. To achieve this, there needs to be a re-structuring of roles and responsibilities. Starting with the Ministry of National Defence, will now have only one function secure the funding necessary for the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) to fulfill their budget obligations to the CF. This means, the CDS will use all of their resources to determine what is needed to adequately defend Canada, meet obligations to our NATO and NORAD partners and equip our CF personnel to do the job we ask them to do on our behalf. 

Now a quick slide show:











This re-structuring of the CF High Command would ensure there is a focused team working together to achieve the defence needs of Canada. We would have the correct number of persons in uniform, in the correct branch, equipped with the proper equipment to do their job in all weather conditions, all seasons, all areas of Canada or foreign theatres we ask our CF personnel to serve. It is insane to continue to ask the CF to do the impossible without giving them the basic tools of their trade. Worse is the practice of promising to acquire the equipment or tools needed and then an election occurs and some new jackasses waddle into Parliament and cancel the purchase agreements and thereby endangering the lives of the CF front line personnel. Who agrees to this system??

Long-range CF planning requires consistency. A consistent strength. A consistent volume and quality of gear, weapons, and ammunition. And consistent high quality leadership. 

The Canadian economy could benefit from consistency, too.  How about a long-term schedule of naval vessels for the Navy and Coast Guard?? Canadian shipbuilders would benefit and so would their employees. How about armoured vehicles and tanks for the Army?? This would benefit the steel manufactures, the vehicle sector, their employees and supporting communities. How about aircraft for the Air Force, Navy, and Army??? Do we have Canadian manufacturers who can build fighter jets?? Helicopters?? Transport planes?? 

A Canada First strategy would use a systems approach to national defence. It would ensure Canadian industry supported the CF by designing and building equipment, gear, and weapons that enabled the CF to do their job. Again, this would be evidence-based on strategic planning to meet the operational needs today and tomorrow. Military planning cycles need to be 25 to 50-years ahead of where we are, so we can get to where we are going. Four years is inadequate for national defence planning, if you want to defend your country from all threats - foreign AND domestic!

Until next time...think about the greater GOOD!

Mountainman.


13 April 2021

Design Idea - A Tethered Drone Antenna for Submarines

 

Peggy's Cove, NS (Photo by V.A. McMillan, 2012)

The idea I want to share today is one that has been bouncing around inside my head for quite some time. Between multiple readings of Tom Clancy's Red Storm Rising (1986) or watching the movie The Hunt for Red October (1990), based on Tom Clancy's novel; I keep noticing one vulnerability for submarines and their crews...which is, having to surface to retrieve messages from HQ. I am not a submariner and that must be taken into consideration with my suggestion.

With the advance in drone technology, why is a tethered drone to carry an antenna to the surface not being used for improving communications connections between submarines and their HQ?? 

I understand there is an extreme low frequency (ELF) radio technology that in theory can communicate with a submerged vessel, however, if I understand things correctly due to the length of the radio waves, it takes a long time for information to be transferred between sender and receiver and back again. 

So, to reduce exposure and to increase information sharing between submarines and their respective HQ's, I would like to suggest a simple concept - the tethered drone submarine antenna. See image below:

The Tethered Drone Submarine Antenna Concept by V.A. McMillan

The idea would allow for an underwater, remote controlled drone to carry from the submarine to the surface (not more than 250 metres above), a tether which would include an antenna for multiple means of communications - UHF, VHF, SATCOM, etc.. In hostile territory, it would be best to use a burst transmission from one location to send information to HQ and then relocate and receive information to the submarine an hour or so later, from a new location. Sending & receiving at the same location seems tactically unwise.

Drones would be smaller than a Mk 18 torpedo, so it would not be a space issue to keep a half-dozen onboard the submarine. I recognize if the submarine had to cut the cable and dive to avoid detection or make evasive maneuvers to avoid contact, the antenna tether and the drone would need to be expendable in design. A simple remote cable cutter to snip the tether would likely be adequate.

The drone would launch from the top side of the vessel, behind the conning tower. The launch area could be similar to a torpedo launcher that can be dry loaded from the inside, flooded before opening the outer hatch/gate. The tether cable would be attached to the inside of the launch tube and limited to 250 metres. The  cable would be spooled on a winch for retrieval and re-use. Further, the spools would be of a quick change design, to replace the tether cable if the previous one had to be cut for an emergency dive.

The drone could also be fitted with sensors and/or video cameras to capture intel from the surface and locate any enemy vessels or aircraft within the area, or field of view.

Well, that is about it. If I have further thoughts on this idea, I will post an update in the future.

Until next time, think about new ideas...and share them!!

Mountainman.








08 February 2021

Scotland The BRAVE!! by Black Tartan Clan - My New Morning Anthem

 


Well, yesterday I discovered a GREAT version of Scotland the Brave on Spotify. This morning I learned the YouTube version has only had 826 views, since it was posted on 11 July 2017...Are you kidding me!! This is one of the most energetic versions of this iconic tune!!

You be the judge:

https://youtu.be/1TdrMC9Zh4U 

Is that not the MOST energetic version of Scotland the BRAVE!!! you have ever heard??



Until next time...Remember your roots!!

Mountainman.




02 February 2021

LRRP Pack System - Long Range Recreation Pack System - Variable Geometry Packs

 

The Variable Geometry Pack System - Prototyped by Covert Industries Inc (circa 2003/2004)


Variable Geometry Packs - Morphing to Meet Your Needs!

This was one of the major prototypes I achieved back in the day when Covert Industries Inc was still around. This is a serious pack system designed for extended periods in the field. The notable feature being all the components that work with the pack and the other components. So, this long overdue review is going online today. Please, join me as we explore the features and options of the Long Range Recreation Pack (LRRP) System.

The amazing part of this pack system is how well all the components work together. As seen in the photo to the left this is a bit larger than your average daypack. 

For those who are going to ask, I am not sure of the exact volume of the pack. An educated guess would be about 65 litres for the main bag. 

The side pockets are another 6 litres, each.

The Pigy-Pak (mini pack) is about 11 litres.

The top pocket is about 4 litres.

And the crampon pouch is about 3 litres.

So, rough guess for all is about 95 litres. 

The pack and all components were made with 1000 denier yellow Cordura and reinforced with 1000 denier black Cordura. 

The webbing is a mix of 3/4", 1" and 2" poly propylene webbing.

The buckles include:

3/4", 1" and 2" side release buckles

1" Super loc ladder buckles

2" Heavy duty ladder loc buckles

The zippers were:

#5 vislon separating

#5 vislon non-separating for the top pocket 


Pictures to the left is the main pack and top pocket with waist belt and the heavy shoulder straps.

Also, is the two side pockets zipped together and being worn as a day pack. 

Here we see the Pigy-Pak mini-daypack               

Here is the single side pocket worn as a sling pack

Another look at the two side pockets as a daypack

Here are all the components of the Long Range Recreation Pack System:

  • Main pack back
  • Side pockets
  • Heavy shoulder straps
  • Light shoulder straps
  • Waist belt
  • Pigy-Pak mini daypack
  • Top pocket
  • Crampon pouch

The LRRP System evolved from the Military Patrolling Pack System. Seen here (left and below) with scabbards instead of side pockets. 

There is a removable cargo pouch on  the front of the main pack.

The top pocket is the tall version with a couple extra litres of volume.

The Military Patrolling Pack uses a 1" harness system and a 2" waist belt.

Axe loops and Hook & Loop handle holders allow ice axes or felling axes to be easily attached to the front of the pack.

The Long Range Recreation Pack was the name for the civilian version. 

While, a similar pack for search and rescue operations would have been named: Long Range Rescue Pack. 

Finally, for military applications the name would have been the Long Range Reconnaissance Pack System

An early Military Patrolling Pack System in civilian colours.

This one (left) has zip-off side pockets and clip-off front pocket. 

Below is the matching daypack that also has zip-off side pockets, albeit on a smaller scale.

Pockets that zip on & off and are compressed in place with webbing straps allow versatility to configure your pack to a volume you need on a trip, outing or mission.

Here we see (left) an early version of the Military Patrolling Pack System, circa 1995. 

A lot has been learned since these humble beginnings. Sewing machines were worn out. Webbing changed. Design layout improved. Harnesses improved. Harness anchor systems evolved.

Tough materials. Solid construction techniques remained from the early days to the last pack prototype made. 

Corners were never cut to save time, materials, or costs. Each pack was built like your life depended on the pack working from the start to the end of the mission. 

So, until next time...Don't cut corners!

Mountainman.